Link to this blogpost:
https://outofbounds2025.blogspot.com/2025/08/case-information-with-opinions-and-more.html?m=1
Reference:
https://outofbounds2025.blogspot.com/2025/08/is-there-legal-business-in-the-house.html?m=1 posted 8/22/2025
PUBLIUSROOTS BLOG was PubliusRoots.com - domain was stolen π€
This blog has not been viewable for a long time due to Cyber Crime. It has a great deal of my work on it regarding trial court. Because my landlord blocks WiFi from me, I had to be quick in sharing my work so please keep that in mind as you try to process what is going on if you're curious.
PubliusRoots blog is here now due to CYBER CRIME
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/
Soak up the π sun π
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/08/sunrisect.html?m=1
π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³
π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³
These are a compilation from the PubliusRoots blog. Topic: ILLEGAL EVICTION
1. Housing Complaint https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/04/motion-to-argueappellate-courtmotion.html?m=1
2. Illegal Eviction case
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/03/affidavit-on-transcript-from-january-13.html?m=1
3. Updates on cases in appeal
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/03/update-on-appeal-6march2025.html?m=1
4. Remaining transcripts https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/03/remaining-transcripts.html?m=1
5. Illegal Eviction case
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/03/transcript-of-january-13-2025.html?m=1
6. Both cases
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/03/pro-hac-vice-appearances-are-only-for.html?m=1
7. Illegal Eviction AC 48416
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/02/trial-court-order-on-payments-of-rent.html?m=1
8. Both cases
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/02/appeal-notifications-on-e-services.html?m=1
9. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/02/illegal-eviction-appeal-on-eviction.html?m=1
10. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/02/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html?m=1
11. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/01/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html?m=1
Several reference links on this blogpost
Note, PubliusRoots domain was stolen so the links need to be corrected
REFERENCE LINKS:
NOTE, YOU MAY NEED TO ADD ?m=1 after the link to access if you are using your phone
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-transcripts.html?m=1
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-motion-to-continue.html?m=1
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/11/illegal-eviction-housing-motion-to.html?m=1
https://singhasongflower.blogspot.com/2024/11/home-on-deranged.html?m=1
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-motion-to-continue.html?m=1
there are more links showing on this topic/horrible experience, if you are up to it. Links are on the motherearth and thunderflower blogs....
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2024/10/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
WHO IS THE LANDLORD REALLY HERE AT 360 STATE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT?
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/01/illegal-evictionwho-is-landlord-really.html?m=1
Reference update: https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/01/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html?m=1
I should have had a hearing! https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ct-court-of-appeals/1265718.html
12. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/01/illegal-evictionwho-is-landlord-really.html?m=1
Noted in blogpost above,: WHO IS THE LANDLORD REALLY HERE AT 360 STATE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT?
WHO OWNS, WHO OPERATES ITS "TWIN TOWER" THREE BLOCKS AWAY?
Reference update: https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2025/01/illegal-eviction-housing-complaint.html?m=1
13. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-transcripts.html?m=1
14. Housing Complaint
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/hud-renewal-packet-waste-of-paper-time.html?m=1
15. Housing Complaint
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-motion-to-continue.html?m=1
This reference should have all references:
https://singhasongflower.blogspot.com/2024/11/home-on-the-deranged.html?m=1
16. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/11/illegal-eviction-housing-motion-to.html?m=1
More referenced links
REFERENCES
https://singhasongflower.blogspot.com/2024/11/home-on-deranged.html?m=1
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-motion-to-continue.html?m=1
there are 2 more links showing on this one, if you are up to it.
TRANSCRIPTS
THERE ARE REPEATED LINKS HERE. I'M SORRY I JUST DINT HAVE TIME TO CORRECT IT.
Yet they were corrupted - recording altered which is typical in this corrupted state! They use the same technology as movie producers use.
https://www.publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/12/illegal-eviction-transcripts.html?m=1
17. https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
ILLEGAL EVICTION: https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2024/10/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
18. https://outofbounds2025.blogspot.com/2025/09/state-v-james.html?m=1
19.
Another one coming up because I don't see Judge Levin's crooked order about me using glue when I wasn't licensed... wtf I thought I typed it - he echo'd ITALIAN Kevin Russo who worked hand in hand with Career Embezzler Lawrence Mark Hurley π€
NEW 3 October 2024 - APPENDIX OF 264 246 PAGES a hacker changed the number of pages from 246 to 264!
This was supposed to be the appendix! Last time I knew Drop Box changed it! Typical government fraud! Drop Box is a contractor for USGov Court system, at least in Connecticut - I'm sure more states.
https://thunderflower2021.blogspot.com/2024/09/illegal-eviction-2024.html?m=1
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=SOCIAL+SECURITY+ACT&f=treesort&num=660#sourcecredit
This link below will not work because the complete url has not been selected. Am having problems with this format - the toolbar keeps disappearing.
WTF - I lined through this since people may have seen it and been confused. That's a technocracy trick.
10/14/2024: I am still not dropbox savvy and need to get to Tyco to find out more. I have had some setbacks and have not been there yet. Hopefully tomorrow.
A HUD Form 52641, also called a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract, is a legal document that outlines the agreement between a landlord and a Public Housing Agency (PHA) where the PHA will provide financial assistance to a tenant (family) leasing a unit from the landlord under the Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8 housing), essentially guaranteeing the landlord a set monthly payment on behalf of the tenant, with specific conditions regarding the unit's eligibility and rent amount that must be met by both parties.
iNCASE ANYONE IS INTERESTED: (all HUD forms)
jud.gov/program_offices/administration/hudclips
July-August 2024
I was traumatized by the maintenance manager violently forcing his way in my apartment 7/2/2024
https://publiusroots.blogspot.com/2024/07/july-2024.html?m=1
This ends the PubliusRoots blogposts
π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³
π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³π³
Who Owns Westlaw?
https://youtu.be/KWiay9HLuG8?si=r63hnl8IHNm8d2nB
.jpeg)
This following case is fraud! I never brought action in trial court against that landlord! I was quite sick, on heart meds. I had all I could do to work and pay for my car and cost of living. I had no idea how to bring any action against the landlord. First time I went to court was when the illegal landlord illegally evicted me in 2002 or 2003 - having lead in my water making me susceptible to having a heart attack, which I did in 2002 (the paramedics said I was having a heart attack when I went to the fire department to get my blood pressure checked) because I was stupid enough to tell the team leader of RGIS Inventory Systems that I need to make sure I'm in a cool place with available clean water to drink - he did just the opposite turning off A/C and I had a heart attack the following day. The crooked hospital could have cared less about the fact the machine was beeping because I was having a heart attack. One doctor tried to get me admitted yet the ER supervisor refused. Feeding the corruption. This was the hospital that Dr. Petit worked at, running a section regarding diabetes, I think....No wonder my neighbor Navneet Tiagi was falsely arrested - he was their satanic sacrifice for Dr. Petit. Navneet was acquitted once he got rid of the crooked attorney he hired. He is a good man, fine doctor-researcher. Cyber crime altered the damn picture and they removed the case!
The case above is all fraud!!! My apartment bldg in New Britain CT was owned by a group of Fairfield attorneys who called themselves Cardinal Hill, LLC.
It appears he is successful and I am glad about that. He worked very hard, loved his job, and would go to Cornell University where his fiance was and even take her clothes and do her laundry to help her stay focused. She sabotaged him. She went to police and said "my boyfriend raped me" no proof, no nothing. And he was not at all like that. It was so rigged that the court set his bail at $1million!! He never was arrested before! He had a healthy lifestyle. I helped clean out his apartment because of this illicit arrest and he couldn't afford bail!
There are only thirteen which show yet there were more and believe you-me, these courts site the lies as justification in other rulings! I need to vent because my briefs as a pro se litigant have to be focused on responding to the merits of the case, which is jack-shit! The court shouldn't have even docketed the eviction case against me! ! I paid my freaking rent!
And my housing complaint needs to address the the continuous abuse and neglect of maintenance, as well as illegal intruders!
I need to get my keyboard out .. I will do my best to place things in chronological order. Just keep in mind that I have briefs to prepare and am very overwhelmed with things. Even leaving my apartment is so stressful because they steal and vandalize - illegally entering.
She dyed her blond hair black...ha! ππ
There are only 13 opinions/rulings in the system but I need to do more searching because I had a lot more cases than that and alot more activity! For example, Appellate rulings on cases which they deliberately withheld trial court rulings!
I have to type them because they will be difficult for you to see since they are deceptively typed with SMALL FONT!
1. Bradley v Barber
139 Conn App 146 (2012) 54 A 3d 1080
139 Conn App 146
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Anne M. Bradley
V
Jerald S Barber et al THERE WAS NO ET AL!
No. 33793
Argued September 21, 2013
Decided November 13, 2012
Appellate Court of Connecticut...November 12, 2012....138 Conn App 146 ...54A 3d 1980
The plaintiff Anne Bradley appeals from the judgment of dismissal rendered pursuant to PB 14-3. The court has reviewed the record, briefs and oral argument thoroughly in this case and has considered the applicable law. We find no error by the trial court in its order dismissing the action.
Citations: 139 Conn App 146, 54 A 3d 1080 (Mem)
Attorney Barber defaulted and also committed a crime by failing to go to court when he was subpoena'd! The court granted the subpeona! I did that to secure my rights since I figured he would fail to appear! Instead, his "secretary" named STEPHANIE WILLIAMS went to the court only at the time he was supposed to appear and said he couldn't make it because he had a sick child - his wife or x-wife could have taken care of the child and no doubt is did nothing for the child and there was no proof!
Attorney Barber stole my $2300 retainer promising he would sue the West Haven Police as well as the University for the illicit arrest and abuse I went through - to include these scumbag crooks forcing me to Yale Hospital, which was KIDNAPPING. They included the abuse, to include being drugged and raped there to teach me a lesson that I don't matter!
Casename was State v Bradley, I was illicitly arrested on 6/16/2025 when I went to pick up my book in the afternoon. I needed the morning to complete Housing Authority papers, applying for Section 8. 360 State Street was marked to be constructed. (In 2009, I followed up with my application because the BOZZUTOS were supposed to take my Qualifying application for Section 8 and process me but they didn't - and some good people, probably FBI, pointed it to their attention in 2012!) I was charged with RISK OF INJURY which is a charge to a child, that is how damned incompetent the police officer was. He was only interested in hype since RISK OF INJURY is a big deal! The judge changed it to RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT, another misdemeanor which requires the VICTIM on record to submit a letter of complaint, notarized, unless the victim was incompetent. They recorded the victim to be the University President, Steven Kaplan! I never even met him in person! He helped me get processed quickly so I could attend the upcoming semester and put the bad experiences behind me. HIS SECRETARY WAS A WOMAN WHO I SAT BY IN CHURCH! I had no idea she worked for the University, let alone the President's office! She was a liar through and through and her daughter, about 10 years younger than me, also was a liar! She said she was disabled from a car accident and could not work! SHE WAS A SECRETARY AT THE UNIVERSITY, I think she work in the Provost Office.
This was a criminal case only because of them and the prosecutor was LAWRENCE MARK HURLEY, who was arrested for embezzling court money and money from the Prosecutor's union - which he obviously did all the time he was there! 19 years! Yet the judge in Middletown limited the state police from auditing to three years - even though it resulted in over 100 charges of embezzlement - a total of over $200,000 stolen from both locations! He forged checks and deposited them in his hidden accounts, which he purchased at a store - prepaid accounts!
I AM TARGETED BECAUSE I AM AGAINST CORRUPTION!
JERALD BARBER STOLE MY MONEY AND DID NOTHING, CONSPIRING WITH LAWRENCE MARK HURLEY! He refused to give me my money back!
================================================================================
Insert :
This is missing from the Westlaw and Appellate records!
AC 30029 - this was my appeal of the trial ruling. The judge went along with the ruling; rather than set it aside which he could have done!
Then judge x-hole rules acquittal as if he made it on his own damn motion!
It was a trick because I had submitted my appeal and other motions!
Once I withdrew my appeal, the State entered appeal of acquittal - a totally UNLAWFUL action! Acquittals cannot be appealed. Setting ASIDE could have been appealed!
I found some documents to support what happened since the court frauds RECORDS, frauds the facts, and more!
Some notes are missing here ..it began with
State v Anne Bradley (illicitly arrested by officer for RISK OF INJURY (which is of a child, duh) - then Lawrence Mark Hurley changed it to RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT - fudging records, not modifying charge or explaining anything. He just wanted to convict me. Abd he got caught embezzling after statute of limitations was up on this ππ© case. My Motion To Dismiss due to Statute of Limitations was shoved under the rug! Judge CRONIN expected to grant it. He said my motion was quite compelling. Then the LAWLESS court system transferred him! I got stuck with Judge Carnival Ronan and he spoke in circles and could give a crap about any motion I submitted because it didn't have pictures! ...I typed this case info...but it must have been deleted -especially for the Italian sausage head Russo who came up with the VS about my using glue when I wasn't licensed. I will look at this more later. It's been a long day. - posted 9/3/2025
6/16/2006;
Connecticut! He'll get arrested for gluing!
This Notice Of Intent was never handed to me; because it was a fraudulent document placed in the record to allude the State had a right to appeal before I did - oh, but the judge forgot, WTF, and HAD to approve the appeal I submitted, AC 30029
bye babying apparently! She worked at that courthouse for years!
Illicit Arrest No. 1 π
See my point?
I always signed the documents I submitted!
I am not an attorney ! I had no juris number!
The fraudulent notice of intent to appeal was granted by judge x-hole so he didn't have to grant state's motion to appeal - but he did because there was no notice of intent! They frauded records! Commonplace! Lawrence Mark Hurley was there for 20 years frauding records, forging checks, using a chemical to remove signatures which was handy-dandy to fraud court documents! And now, it's even easier to do with Internet and partnering with technocrats like Microsoft!
Pre-appeal Motion was another Motion To Dismiss by me, not the State! Yet they want to allude the State was the appellant! THIS was a second arrest - in 2016, when State police came to my residency, stalking me for 40 minutes in the lobby, while paid employee Karem Singh was watching the video to tell them when I left my apartment. I was taking trash out and they rushed up the elevator. WTF
This is the crap I have had to deal with for years! CORRUPTION! LAWLESSNESS! ORGANIZED CRIME!
You will notice that "101" is repeated due to cyber crime; not because I submitted it that way. The numbers are identically scripted! They did that with "103" also! Probably more! They frame themselves!
Date is 7/7/2008! Two years after I was illicitly arrested! One year+ after statute of limitations! The case should have been dismissed a year before that! Judge Cronin was going to dismiss it! The court made him go to another court despite his saying he would be back and issue a formal opinion. THAT is what was similar to State v James - except in Joseph Alexander James' case the judge was obviously murdered! He had an untimely heart attack!
I may create another blogpost to upload all images I take - but Android/Google no longer puts them in chronological order. For the most part, they are reverse chronological but they have mish-mashed the order also.
================================================================================
2. State V Bradley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
March 25, 2010
295 Conn 917 990 A 2d 867
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V
ANNE M BRADLEY
Docketed March 25 2010
Attorney: Lisa A Riggionne, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 30149) is denied.
NORCOTT, J did not participate in the consideration of or decision on the petition.
All Citations
295 Conn 917, 990 A 2d 867 (Mem)
===============================================================================
3. State v Bradley
Appellate Court of Connecticut
137 Conn App 585
August 21, 2012
137 Conn App 585
No. 33370
Argued May 29, 2012
Decided August 21, 2012
Decided on March 25, 2010
Lisa Riggione, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition . With whom on the brief, Kevin H. Lawlor his brother was an attorney who was a horrible teacher and pathalogical liar at Univ of New Haven! And Kevin S. Russo, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state) NOT THE FREAKING UNIVERSITY! UNDERSTAND THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BY THE COURT!
Opinion
*587 In this matter, the defendant, Anne Bradley was found guilty by a jury of breach of peace in the second degree in violation of CGS 53a-181 (6)
Richard Blumenthal decided to take part in this criminal activity and had them ADDUCE TWO CHARGES OF BREACH OF PEACE, which he obviously knew was OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!
1. The case was one year past the statute of limitations! I motioned to dismiss several times including it was past statute of limitations. Judge CRONIN said he was likely to dismiss the case! He said he would issue his deecision at my next hearing. THE CHIEF COURT ADMINISTRATOR took him off the case and transferred him to another court! Judge RONAN, who was a complete asshole, reappeared on the case. I had two years of hearings by assholes until Judge Cronin presided and they transferred him! THEY FRAUD THE CASE MORE BY USING HIS NAME FOR THE OPINION!
Opinion
PER CURIAM
*587 In this matter, the defendant, Anne M. Bradley, was found guilty by a jury of Breach of the Peace in the second degree in violation of CGS 53a-191 (6)
Judge Bruce Levin, father of an attorney π΄ I removed from a personal injury case because he was a liar and could have cared less about filing workers comp for me, and more! I had a bad concussion from a man who ran into me on my way to work! A co-worker took me to the hospital! The paramedics on the ambulance REFUSED even though my forehead was all black and blue! I had a concussion and was crying from the trauma and pain and being treated like shit because they wanted to "protect" the multi billion medical company. The one who slammed into me was obviously trying to push me into traffic at a very heavy traffic 4-corners, Exit 39 off the highway going to work at Kaman Aerospace. I was so far ahead of the job that all the processing was finished. I had caught the woman I replaced up and finished a week ahead! I was very competent using the 10-key and that was a big reason why.
π΄That attorney was Paul Levin whose office was located at 200 Pearl Street , Hartford CT. Somewhere here I made a mistake he was at Capital Avenue. No he wasn't. I'm very tired and will finish this to the best of my ability later today. It is 2:31 am on August 23, 2025
The defendant thereafter moved for a judgment of a acquittal I moved for acquittal, for retrial, to set aside, removal of the judge, and whatever else I could move - all of which the court should have ruled on! But Levin did not and the clerk in the office just said, "You should be glad; you were acquitted" I said I have been cheated since DAY ONE! THIS WAS A VERY TRAUMATIZING TWO YEARS BY CROOKED PEOPLE and they refused to dismiss it since the statute of limitations is one year! So don't tell me how lucky I am with anything! My motions should have been heard - all of them! THEY MADE THE RECORDS DISAPPEAR because dishonesty is their best policy!
THE POINT i motioned them all and no ruling was heard, alluded the judge was doing me a favor acquitting when it as all Devil's Chessboard tactics so the state could appeal - but that was illegal! APPEALS ON AC QUITTALS OF MURDER CANNOT EVEN TAKE PLACE UNLESS POLITICIANS STEP IN AND CLAIM INFRACTIONS OCCURRED DURING COURT!
JUDGE LEVIN RULED THAT HE WOULD ACCEPT KEVIN RUSSO'S APPEAL USING STATE V JOSEPH ALEXANDER JAMES case ....
I looked up that case and found more fraud, more abuse of power, more corruption!
I spoke to both him and his wife! He did not miss any work yet the court altered the case to him being sentenced to prison for 48 months!
Mr. James was entrapped by a West Hartford detective who dressed in a Fed Es suit WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF FEDERAL EXPRESS and therefore impersonating Fed Ex! Mr. James was doing his job delivering shipping and receiving products. This was a received product which was sent to another employee. It was not his job to open anything. It was given to that employee and it was filled with some kind of illegal drugs. NOT ONE FREAKING ONCE DID THEY INDICATE THE EMPLOYEE WAS ARRESTED AND THERE WAS ANOTHER CASE! Mr. James, who had worked there several years, a legitimate immigrant from Jamaica, was thereafter deported back to Jamaica to cover up their lying asses in court! The trial judge on his case said the case had no merit and he was throwing it out! THE JUDGE THEN DIED OF A HEART ATTACK! This was definitely murder!
Marta James was a hair dresser and very nice. We kept in touch for a while but my computer was destroyed by cyber crime!
Some asshole is trying to delete what I type and get me off my blog!
....which the trial court granted on July 7, 2008. The state then filed a motion requesting permission to appeal, which the trial court granted. All premeditated!! The appeal was immediately following the judge's acquttal!
The state appealed and this court reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case with direction to reinstate the jury's guilty verdict and to proceed to sentencing.
Judge Levin granted the acquittal and then granted the appeal and granted it to be reinstated! Judge Levin ADDUCED the two breach of peace charges during Voire Dire which is also ILLEGAL!
He charged me and I refused to plea saying there was no long form information and the charge was illegal due to DOUBLE JEOPARDY and also the case was past the statute of limitations! They didn't care because they had one string they could play - MY FREAKING RELATIVES, WHO LITERALLY KILLED OUR DAD AND HAVE ALWAYS OBSESSED ABOUT FRAMING ME AS A BAD PERSON!
My own mother stole my winter job and disrupted my livelihood to pay my mortgage in the store I owned and also lived in after the HUD tenant was late on rent, and failed to do work for me to compensate for the rent! I did what I could to help him and he just played on the string of dishonesty. I did not even officially evict him in 1980. I let him and family leave on their own recognizance - and I never got any supplement from HUD. The prior owner was probably getting it! It was so long ago, I just recall dismissing the struggles. One mortgage was paid off and the other one was current. I had excellent credit yet nobody would report my credit to the bureaus! Because I had the audacity to tell a stalking sex trafficker to leave me alone, he was a pig - and almost get murdered by the sander truck driver!
The state appealed and this court reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case with direction to reinstate the jury's guilty verdict and to proceed to sentencing. See State v Bradley, 123 Conn App 197, 4 A 3d 347, cert denied, 295 Conn 917, 990 A 2d 867 (2010). On March 21, 2011, the trial court sentenced the defendant to six months of incarceration, execution suspended, and two years of probation. This appeal followed:
The probation was STOPPED. No order was entered in the system and the damn probation officer said she was trying to get me forced to prison because she changed the report date and DID NOT EVEN CALL ME, and said because she emailed me, she was trying to get me arrested - telling me this in person when I was "reporting". She probed me every time for my personal information and I said it was none of her business. I did not commit any crimes and had never committed any crime. I am against corruption!
I think the New Britain Chief of Police William Sencio and the detective Sargent Baden and Agent William Aldenburg had her fired and more. I WAS TOLD MY PROBATION ENDED after 6 months or less of their bullshit!
On appeal, the defendant claims that her constitutional right against double jeopardy was violated when, on the state's appeal from the posttrial judgement of acquittal entered for her by the trial court, this court reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the case with direction to reinstate the jury's verdict.
The defendant's claim is controlled by the our Supreme Court's decision in *588 State v Avcollie 178 Conn 450, 453, A 2d 118 (1079), cert denied, 444 US 1015, 100 S CT 667 62 I, Ed 2d 645 (1980) in which the court held
"When a case has been tried to a jury, the principle of double jeopardy does not prohibit an appeal by the prosecution providing that a retrial is not required in the event the prosecution is successful in its appeal. This, where a jury returns a verdict of guilty by the trial court thereafter renders a judgment of acquittal, an appeal is permitted and double jeopardy does not attach. "
MORE LIES! I argued in trial court Voire Dire for illegally charging me afyer statute of limitations - during Voire Dire also illegal - Double Jeopardy for charging me twice for breach of peace -
I also referred to these illegalities in my motions to acquit, motion for retrial, motion to remove the judicial authority, and other motions all reflecting they are crooked as hell!
I continued with that and they freaking lie on record to satisfy RICHARD BLUMENTHAL'S crimes - and he gained more power from the elites by causing me this harm. I saw him at a St. Patrick's Day Parade and said it was unfair and he wanted me to go away! I never went to a St Patrick's Day Parade here again! Blumenthal always showed up to strut his criminal stuff, having a reputation of being a paedophile also! He considered himself a good replacement for Joe Lieberman. Well, apparently Former Senator Lieberman was better regarded yet confronting corruption was not his thing. [This was edited about 8 hours after I typed it 8/22/2025]
Id, at 453, 423, A 2d, 1118. Because this court directed the trial court to reinstate the jury's guilty verdict after it reversed the judgment of acquittal, and no new trial of her case was there by necessitated, the court's order did not place the defendant twice in jeopardy for the same offense. Accordingly, the defendant's claim must fail.
The judgment is affirmed.
All citiations
137 Conn App 585, 49 A 3d 297 (Mem)
Footnotes
The defendant also claims that the court erred in denying her motion to review her sentence and that it considered improper matters at her sentencing hearing. During the pendency of this appeal, the defendant successfully completed her sentence of probation.
No - it was not "completed" do the math! There were not 2 years! More lies about this! Also they should have said,
Due to the fact we were so busy in creating the Sandy Hook Shooting fraud and swindling the economy of at least one trillion dollars and the need to cover up for Obama crimes, and also geoengineer the Hurricane Sandy so people will "oo" and "ahh" as if God had his hand in all this, we decided slack off our criminal activity of fraud on this case and stop the illicit probation order.
There is this no practical relief that we can AFFORD the defendant as to her sentence. Accordingly, the defendant's claims regarding her sentence are moot. See State v. Boyle, 287 Conn 478, 486-87, 949 A 2d 460 (2008); see also State v Scott, 83 Conn App 724, 726-27, 851 A 2d 353 (2004) (defendant's challenges to judgment of conviction were not moot due to his completion of sentence but his challenge to terms of condisional discharge was moot because court could not afford practical relief as to such claim)
================================================================================
4. State v Bradley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided Dec 12, 2012 Right when the fake Sandy Hook Shooting occurred!
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification her appeal from the Appellate Court 137 Conn App 585, 49 A 3d 297, is denied.
All Citations
307 Conn 939, 56 A 3d 950 (Mem)
================================================================================
9. State V Bradley I took this out of the order printed due to its relevancy with the prior cases
2007 WI 3173693
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available
UNPUBLISHED OPINION CHECK COURT RULES BEFORE CITING
Superior Court of Connecticut
Judicial District of ANSONIA -MILFORD
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V
ANNE M BRADLEY
No. CR0600596518
October 19, 2007 - recorded/frauded date of State's appeal on Trial: July 7, 2007 MORE FRAUDED RECORDS! THE CASE WAS A YEAR PAST STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, Trial WAS IN 2008! PROSECUTOR LAWRENCE MARK HURLEY WAS ARRESTED A FEW MONTHS BEFORE THAT. KEVIN RUSSO REPLACED HIM, CONTINUOUSLY SPINNING LIES!
OPINION
CRONAN, J There was no opinion by this judge! He presided over one hearing - he said he expected to dismiss it - and said he would issue an opinion at the next hearing! I complained that there was no opinion and they switched back to RONAN!
SO THIS DOCUMENT IS 100% FRAUDULENT
*1. This is a criminal case in which the defendant was charged with Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree under Section 53a-64 of the Connecticut General Statutes. The defendant has filed two separate Motions to Dismiss. The first on December 30, 2006 and the second on July 31, 2007. Both matters were joined and heard on September 13, 2007.
This Court has reviewed both Motions. The Motion dated December 30, 2006 reflected the defendant's dissatisfaction with her experiences with the Milford Superior Court in general and with the role of state's attorneys, defense attorneys and judges. The Motion dated July 31, 2007 reiterates many of the same complaints but employs various sections of resources including the Connecticut General Statutes, the Connecticut Practice Book and ABA Standards to reinforce her complaints.
This court must apply the authority granted to it by the CPB Rules of the Superior Court, 41-8, in reviewing the Motion to Dismiss. 41-8 states the following defenses or objections, if capable of determination without a trial of the general issue, shall, if made prior to trial, be raised by a motion to dismiss the information:
1) Defects in the institution of the prosecution including any grand jury proceedings.
I was illicitly arrested! Even Reckless Endangerment requires to be in a public place! I did not even know what Dr. Kaplan looked like! There also was no Long Form Information in the file - Judge CRONAN said the case was badly mishandled!
2) Defects in the information including failure to charge an offense
So x-hole Judge Levin claimed I argued they failed to charge me an offense! TOTALLY A LIE! THEY FRAUD RECORDS TO COVER UP WHAT REALLY HAPPENED!
3) Statue of Limitations
It is one year! Illicitly arrested 6/16/2006, Had a fraudulent attorney Jerald S. Barber so I lost two months defending myself; One year expired 6/17/2007 - I refused to plea because the preliminary hearing did not cover any reasons for the charge. They immediately jumped into the assumption I was guilty with no letter of complaint from Dr. Kaplan, which is required by law!
4) Absence of jurisdiction of the court over the defendant of the subject matter.
There was no subject matter!
5) Insufficiency of evidence or cause to justify the bringing or continuing of such information or placing the defendant on trial
A MOTION TO DISMISS IS A PRE-TRIAL MOTION! WTF!
6) Previous prosecution barring the present prosecution
Sure, the prosecutor wants you to suck him off and everything will be alright! And he goes on to raping and molesting kids as his hobby!
7) Claim that the defendant has been denied a speedy trial
8) Claim that the law defining the offense charged is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid
9) ANY OTHER GROUNDS!!!!
And I was thorough! Looking up case laws in Lois Law and also looking the cases up on microfiche finding out they were frauding records on a continuous basis!
The Court has reviewed all of the relevant claims made by the defendant and concludes that none satisfy the provisions of a 41-8 of the CPB. Several of the claims may well serve as defenses for the defendant at the time of trial, but the Court finds no basis for granting either Motion.
The defendant's Motion to Dismiss are denied.
Not denied by Judge Cronin! This was obviously written by the slimeball Russo because he was constantly twisting words and evading responsibility!
================================================================================
12, State v Anne Bradley
Appellate Court of Connecticut
September 28, 2010
124 Conn App 197
No. 30149
4 A 3d 347
CRIMINAL JUSTICE - disorderly conduct. - they lie again to allude I was drunk! I haven't had any alcohol since 1993! Evidence was sufficient to support verdict that defendant recklessly created a condition that was both public and hazardous.
SYNOPSIS
Background: Following jury verdict finding defendant guilty of one count of breach of peace Note, not only was I unlawfully charged during Voire Dire by a judge who was getting revenge for his son Paul Levin of 100 Capital Ave, Hartford, CT - but the judge only allowed 3 preemptory challenges on a jury of 6 when there is supposed to be one preemptory per juror - so he could sleeze in the contractor who worked for only West Haven police, so he testified. And I requested he be removed and was refused! I cited laws, rules and not a damn thing mattered to this hell-bent derelict of a judge! And the contractor was apparently made the lead juror; yet another juror assured me that he was hell-bent on getting me convicted and so he recommended the guilty of one of the violations of charges, breach of peace to get the whiner off their backs and they could go back to work and the judge not complain that the jury was hung by the x-hole who I wanted removed - not only because I had the pre-emptory challenge to do so but also because of conflict of interest, being a contractor for all police in West Haven!
The Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia-Milford, Levin, J, granted defendant's Motion for judgment of acquittal, and state appealed. And do they state that Judge Levin appealed his own damn ruling? NO!!
Holding: The Appellate Court held that evidencce was sufficient to support verdict that defendant recklessly created a condition that was both public and hazardous.
Reversed and remanded with direction.
1. Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct. Weight and sufficiency of evidence
I was NOT in a public place, as required to charge me for either misdemeanor! They also label at as disorderly conduct which was false and no relevance.
They also lie - falsify facts and fail to even administer the law!
Evidence at trial for breach of the Peace was sufficient to support jury verdict that defendant, who mailed university president a package, opened by president's secretary, containing "a pile of junk" consisting of a cellular telephone and flattened beer cans and soda cans that were glued together with an adhesive which caused a burning sensation when smelled by campus police officer, recklessly created a condition that was both public and hazardous; while package was addressed to university president, it was opened by his secretary three freaking days before - with no HAZMAT procedure and just a nasty woman who was getting her kicks lying to me at church and now for her big hurrah, entrap me! Her name was Lucy Wendlyn and I noticed on internet she died - good riddens! And she was not even retired yet! What does that mean? It means the underworld uses people and throws them away! Karen, her daughter who also lied to me, probably died too!
Containing a "pile of junk" consisting of a cellular telephone and flattened beer cans and soda cans that were glued together with an adhesive which caused a burning sensation when smelled by campus police officer, recklessly created a condition that was both public and hazardous;
AND THEY FOLLOWED NO HAZMAT PROTOCOL AND NOBODY ADVISED THEM TO FOLLOW ANY! ONLY WHEN I BROUGHT IT UP DID THEY CALL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHICH DESTROYED THE "EVIDENCE" AND OF COURSE THE LETTER INSIDE SO THEY COULD BE LYING ASSHOLES!
WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT A COURT THAT USES HERESAY? And I said that all along! No evidence! Not even any photos - just two bit scumbags that got their kicks to get me arrested and put me in my place - and I was a matriculated student with an ID and rights but the damn school did not even follow their own regulations as well as what is set forth by the Dept of Education!
While package was addressed to university president, it was opened by his secretary, defendant was aware that president had an "open door policy" and encouraged visitors to his office and there was expert testimony that glue used to glue together items in package could cause contact dermatitis "in many cases" CGS A 53a 181 (6)
ATTORNEY AND LAW FIRMS
**347 Kevin D. Lawlor, state's attorney, Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state's attorney, and Kevin Russo, supervisory assistant state's attorney, filed a brief for the appellant. (State)
They do not keep briefs for public view so why the hell they say this is like saying someone has a gun but the gun is not even loaded! They also fail to include Lawrence Mark Hurley, who was the only prosecutor on the case against me for almost two damn years - maybe more than two years! He was arrested in 2008....
Hurley was arrested on over 100 counts of embezzlement so this memo issued by Paul Vance is a lie! The judge changed the charges to one count larceny, one count forgery even though he did it hundreds of times and stole all the money - hundreds of thousands of dollars - and they set bail for less than what he stole! And that is why they would not allow state police to further investigate! He used the money to pay for more luxuries, use in pay to play schemes, and pay an attorney NORMAN PATTIS, who actually hired him to practice law in his office while he did not have a license! It was pulled but WTF - they have incompetent people in the courts now who are not even real attorneys! It is their satanic mockery and curse for not letting Hurley get away with being such a cold-blooded theif and no doubt he altered records because that is just common practice in the courts!
GRUENDEL, HARPER AND BEACH, Jus
OPINION
PER CURIAM
The trial court did not set aside the judgment - outright lie!
*198 The state appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting aside the jury's verdict finding the defendant, Anne M. Bradley, guilty of one count of breach of **348 the peace in the second degree in violation of the General statutes 53a 181 (6)
(a) A person is guilty of breach of the peace in the second degree when, with intent to cause inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, such person: (1) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior in a public place; or (2) assaults or strikes another; or (3) threatens to commit any crime against another person or such other person's property; or (4) publicly exhibits, distributes, posts up or advertises any offensive, indecent or abusive matter concerning any person; or (5) in a public place, uses abusive or obscene language or makes an obscene gesture; or (6) creates a public and hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which such person is not licensed or privileged to do. For purposes of this section, “public place” means any area that is used or held out for use by the public whether owned or operated by public or private interests.
(b) Breach of the peace in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.
For emphasis, in order to charge someone breach of peace, they have to qualify for all elements, including being in a public place.
I was never there! They listed Dr. Kaplan as the victim yet claim Lucy Wendlyn was victim but she never went to the hospital - and only when I asked why they did not follow any HAZMAT PROTOCOL, did they send officer gofer to the hospital when the package was opened three days before that!
They destroyed the package too! There was no evidence and only heresay which did was one story by one person and another story by another but it didn't matter because they could rely on more fraud by techs to alter the recording when the transcripts are made!
Jurors who do not play the court's GAME will face problems in their lives!
This source is written by a Connecticut Prosecutor so take it with a grain of salt because THREATENING is not BREACH OF PEACE. It is threatening! That is a separate charge! They lie like hell here and all to collude with each other!
Elements of the Crime Which Must be Established by The Prosecution
To be convicted of breach of peace in the second degree in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-181 the state's attorney has to prove that the defendant acted with the intent to cause "inconvenience, annoyance or alarm" or recklessly creating a risk of the same, engaged in one of the following acts:
- Fighting in a public place;
- Violent or threatening behavior in a public place;
- A physical assault;
- Threaten to commit a crime or damage someone's property;
- Publicly post, exhibit or advertise obscene or offensive materials concerning another person;
- Use obscene or vulgar language or gestures in a public place;
- Create a hazardous or physically offensive condition in a public area.
Why did you not inform me of this?' Her answer was just as slutty as she is!
The state claims that the evidence There was no f'king evidence! They got the fire dept to go to the campus and blast it with their hose - blasting it to smitherines, and disposing of it!
Was sufficient to support the jury's verdict. We agree with the state. Accordingly, we reverse the *199 judgment of the court and remand the case with direction to reinstate the jury verdict and to proceed to sentencing.
WHAT THEY DID WAS AGREE TO THE JUDGE'S F'KING APPEAL! HE APPROVED IT; SAME ONE WHO RULED ACQUITTAL. IT IS CONSTANT LEGAL MALPRACTICE IN THE COURTS!
The record reveals the following facts, which the jury reasonably could have found, and the following procedural history. In 2006, the defendant applied for and was granted admission to the University of New Haven. At about this same time, she began writing letters to Stephen Kaplan, LIE!!! I was admitted just days before that and could attend my first class on a Saturday but I needed to get my book, which was Friday. It was a very close call. I was on the campus for registering and processing but they had no funds for me to get my book and I had to wait for money in my account. I paid for that book!!! I had to call with a southern accent and say I was calling for my friend since the police harassed me and threatened me and told I could not call anyone or write anyone there! I pulled it off and they credited back the book - money I so desperately needed! I did not have social security yet and when I did get it, they failed to make it retroactive to two years before that when I had Medicare right away. I was told Medicare is a two-year wait! They only gave me a few months, 1/3 of which I paid ahead on my rent because Corey my landlord needed money to pay his mortgage! He then lied about my not giving him rent and I had to prove it through my bank account!
Do not be nice to people here - they only stab you in the back! I would leave in a heartbeat if I could!
the president of the University. The defendant testified that these letters initially explained her "aspirations" to Kaplan but that eventually she began discussing "stress factors" that she feared would interfere with her enrollment. For instance, in a letter dated June 2, 2006, the defendant discussed at length her frustrations related to a worker's compensation claim she made against an employer.
That was true. The letter had more in it. Much more since I had just been matriculated and was looking forward to participating and sorry that I could not go up the four flights of stairs to his office to thank him personally.
They like to mention the possibility of stealing money and using some fake legal reason!
And that is definitely a modus operandi of all the sleeze bags that TAKE money and don't make money here! For instance, my monther died in August - this corrupted landlord figured I would get an inheritance so they filed an eviction and claimed I did not pay rent for August and September. As a section 8 tenant they are required first to submit a pre termination notice and give me 30 days to get my rights. THAT IS LAW.
BUT NO, they did not do that! And it did not matter to this fake judge who is obviously not an attorney or got it out of the same cracker jack box that Barack Obama got his - since he did not attend classes even! He was an elite, his father was a powerful CIA terrorist!
NOTE! This opinion admits the letter was sent or received June 2! It was mailed June 2 - the campus received it June 3 and that means it was brought to Lucy Wendlyn on June 3. It was priority mail and I finally found my priority tracking number despite the fact that damn school had it and withheld that evidence as well! Priority mail is delivered to the offices! It was fairly slow at that time since classes had not started - she got it on June 3! For her to testify that she left it unopened for three days was even laughable. Do the math! She had it for 13 days! They did not even have any letters which I wrote to Dr. Kaplan and could have easily obtained them! They would be incriminating themselves!
She made an ass out of herself so many times that even donkeys would be put to shame to be described like them!
On June 16, 2006, a package that she had been sent by the defendant another injected lie! I sent the Priority Mail to Dr. Kaplan! There was no evidence of the package - only the DESTRUCTION OF THE PACKAGE. THE FIRE DEPT SPRAYED IT WITH THEIR HOSE, CONTRARY TO SHOWING THEY POURED WATER ON IT, USING THE SCHOOL'S FAUCET - THEY USED THEIR HOSE AND OBLITERATED THE LETTER AND PAPERWEIGHT! HERE LUCY WENDLYN READ THE WHOLE LETTER WITHOUT USING PLASTIC GLOVES AND HAD NO SUDE EFFECTS! SHE PRACTICALLY GROWLED AT ME WHEN I POINTED THAT OUT! AND SHE HAD OPENED IT DAYS BEFORE YET WAS GROOMED TO LIE ABOUT IT - WHICH SHE DID VERY BADLY! Reminder: this was a woman I sat by in church with her daughter Karen (who told me she was permanently disabled and couldn't work - yet I found out at trial she also worked for the University of New Haven!) who turned out to be a liar through and through! via the United States Postal Service arrived at Kaplan's office. The package was opened by Kaplan's executive secretary, Lucy Wendlyn They spell her name wrong as WENDLAND to protect the guilty!
Wendlyn, having previously opened correspondence sent to Kaplan from the defendant, recognized the return address as the defendant's and opened the package. Inside the package, Wendlyn found a "pile of junk", consisting of a cellular telephone and flattened beer cans and soda cans that were "glued together" in "one piece". They use quotation marks yet fail to cite the source - if it was the transcript or most likely, Russo told us to type that. And they just assume it was junk because they are conspiring. The junk was held together with a "polymeric adhesive" So said Prosecutor Russo, who earned his pay to play points and became a judge who conspired with Obama to push the Sandy Hook Shooting fraud! In many cases such adhesives can cause skin irritation. The package also contained a handwritten letter the defendant had written to Kaplan, the first paragraph of which read, "I bet nobody has ever given you literal junk before. And her's some junk, but I sanitized it with Clorox before spraying glaze on it." Upon opening the package and examining and touching the contents, Wendlyn experience inconvenience, annoyance, and alarm. In court, I asked her if she was so alarmed, why did she take time to read the whole letter and then carefully put the paperweight and letter back in the package? Russo objected and Levin sustained of course! And I also asked why she had them destroy the letter as well - and asked her if she made a copy of it and also asked her where were the other letters - object, object, and object - and Levin sustained!
Levin only overruled my objections! Even when Russo used the "Golden Rule" saying to the jury that rule, WHICH IS UNLAWFUL. It is not just frowned upon as shitty prosection.
It didn't matter because they struck it from the transcript as a surprise! And I asked her what she did when she opened the package. She glared at me and said "I did not like it!" She also admitted to taking the letter out and reading it all. And again, no mention of having any harm come to her; just the fact she wanted to hate me! Being a liar at church just wasn't enough to satisfy her. I had crocheted a blanket for Fr. Moffo and gave it to him. She would not acknowledge that but she knew it.
My closing statement emphasized that Lucy Wendlyn was doing a bad job in helping police entrap me and I stated why, coming right from her statements.
*200 Wendlyn contacted the campus police and Sargeant Ronald Whittaby of the University police department responded, Whittaby brought the package back to the campus police department where he removed the objects contained therein. I asked Lucy Wendlyn if she wore plastic gloves. She said no. Whittaby was so stupid that he proved he was not wearing gloves yet supposedly had to contain the paperweight and claimed it was dangerous and did not even put on plastic gloves! ENTRAPMENT WAS ALL THIS CASE WAS ABOUT AND THE WHOLE DAMN COURT WAS IN ON IT!
Whittaby testified that; with no proof! No video, yet they use videos all over police departments! This was a slam-dunk attack on me and no matter what laws they break, they were hell-bent to feed the bad wolf πΊ which is the corruption that has claim to fame feeding Walk Street!
As Whittaby did this, he noticed a chemical smell emanating from the items in the package and saw that the items were held together with "some type of gooey substance" And they refered to Whittaby as an expert! That is like the "got it" crap that the technocracy uses - children use a term like that. Of course we know that most of the technocrats are paedophiles and rapist along with being everyday criminals in operating their businesses! Whittaby touched the substance with his fingers, which he then brought c lose to his nose to smell. After doing so, Whittaby felt "a burning sensation" in his mouth area, which became so painful that he he feared he was going to get blisters. After dropping the package off at the forensics laboratory on campus for analysis Nobody from forensics testified and there was no report entered as evidence - only Whittaby's gooey bullshit! Whittaby went to a hospital where he was treated for irritant dermatitis and released the same day. Irritant dermatitis is a skin inflammation caused by a chemical irritant. Whittaby entered the police department while they were harassing me. His hands look fine. I asked to see them. The stupidity that he said was so bizar, and of course none of it was recorded After all , they were just a police department! Another thing I asked about and got a big "I object!" From Russo. Which was sustained by Paul Levin's daddy who only was there to serve one purpose, get me convicted!
More fraud, they slip in a different statute than what was on the police slip which I was handed! He used a different statute and charged me with Risk of Injury! Claiming Dr. Kaplan was the victim!
And two counts of breach of the Peace in the second degree in violation of section 53a - 181 (6) Every damn record on that case, including the prosecutor had just Reckless Endangerment - they are frauds, they disrupted my life, they cost me so much pain and suffering! Once Richard Blumenthal cooked up this adding two of the same charge agenda - which is DOUBLE JEOPARDY, a federal crime! - they all ganged in! The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on the count of reckless endangerment and not guilty of one count of breach of the Peace. There was no canvassing of the jurors allowed!
Count three of the state's information charged, in relevant part, "On they isolate the "O"as if it was a necessary religious satanic requirement! **349 the 16th day of June, 2006 14 days after they got the package and my letter! At or around the area known as the University of New Haven [the defendant] recklessly created a risk that caused inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm on [Wendlyn] , in that she created a public and hazardous condition by the act of introducing a chemical into an envelope which was not licensed or privileged to do. In violation of 53a - 181 (6)" These people should have been imprisoned for what they did to me with this nonsense - rhetoric! Instigated by Kevin Russo and Lawrence Mark Hurley! The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the count of breach of peace. *201 Following the verdict, the defendant filed a motion for a judgment of acquittal, which was granted by the same x-hole who agreed with the jury! Yes, the judge agreed since he could have set it aside during the trial! by the trial court. In its appeal from the judgment of the trial court, the state argues that the court improperly determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. We agree with the state.
They also agree with the damn judge because he appealed himself! This Devils Chessboard trick was preplanned! Because I had all possible motions submitted! I was prepared for the worst since the jury seemed to be latching on to lies - but they really weren't. The only liar in the jury was the contractor and he was making the jury hung by his obsession to get me convicted - no doubt pay to play!
We begin by setting forth our standard of review. It is well established that under the common law a trial court has the discretionary power TO BREAK THE LAW! To modify, or vacate a criminal judgment before the sentence is executed. The Superior Court's power in the respect, as evidenced by PB 42-51 et seq, provides a defendant with the ability to request that the court render a judgment of acquittal despite a guilty verdict. The trial court, thus, may determine that the verdict is legally flawed, and either release the defendant or order a new trial. Citations omitted: internal quotation marks omitted. State v McCahill, 261 Conn 492, 517, 811 A 2d 667 (2002)
Where, as here, the trial judge disagrees with the verdict of the jury, a vexing question often arises ... When this occurs, we review the action of the judge in setting the verdict aside rather than that of the jury in rendering it. Citation omitted; internal quotations marks omitted. Campbell v Gould 194 Conn 35, 39, 478 A 2d 596 (1984). In the present case, the trial court determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict. "In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we apply a two-part test. First we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdicgt. Second, we determine whether upon the facts so construed and the inferences reasonable drawn therefrom the [trier of fact] reasonably could have concluded that the cumulative force of the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt...In evaluating evidence, the trial of fact is not required to *202 accept as dispositive those inferences that are consistent with the defendant's innocence...The trier may draw whatever inferences from the evidence or facts established by the evidence it seems to be reasonable and logical...This does not require that each subordinate conclusion established by or inferred from the evidence, or even from other inferences, be proved beyond a reasonable doubt...because this court has held that [triers] factual inferences that support a guilty verdict need only be reasonable...notice the constant drifting of sentences with .... WTF
[A]s we have often noted, proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all possible doubt...nor does proof beyond a reasonable doubt require acceptance of every hypothesis of innocence posed by the defendant that, had it been found credible by the trier, would have resulted in an acquittal...On appeal, we do not ask whether there is a reasonable view of he evidence that would support a reasonable view of the evidence that supports the [trier's] verdict of guilty...Furthermore, in our process of review, it does not diminish the probabative force of the evidence that it consists, in whole or in part, of evidence that is circumstantial rather than direct...It is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of the multitude of facts which established guilt in a case involving **350 substantial circumstantial evidence. Internal quotations omitted. State v Butler, 296 Conn 62, 76-77, 993 A 2d 970 (2010) They are not supposed to cite cases that came AFTER my case - because it shows they are manufacturing their f*king opinion.
Section 53a-181 (6) provides: "A person is guilty of breach of the Peace in the second degree when, with intent to cause inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk therof, such person...creates a public and hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which such person is not licensed or privileged to do. For purposes of this section, "public place" means any area that is used or held out for use *203 by the public whether owned or operated by public or private interests...The trial court concluded that the state failed to prove that the condition created by the defendant was either public or hazardous. We disagree. It is clear to us that, when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict of guilty, the jury reasonably could have concluded that the cumulaltive force of the evidence established that the defendant recklessly created a condition that was both public and hazardous. Accordingly, we conclude that the court abused its discretion by granting the motion for a judgement of acquittal. The court abused its discretion by going along with the jury, not setting the aside their verdict; then granting my motion for acquittal and then flipflopping again by supporting the damn verdict - full 360 degree circle!
And my other motions were not objected to by the prosecutor! This motion may not have been either on paper because my motion was that strong!
With regard to the public nature of the condition created by the defendant, the state presented evidence that, although the package was addressed to the president of the University, it was opened by Wendlyn, his secretary. Moreover, by the defendant's own admission, she was aware that the president had an "open door policy" and encouraged students to visit his office. With regard to the hazardous nature of the condition the state presented expert testimony Sure, GOOEY substance is expert! That polymeric adhesives, like those used to glue together the items inside the package, can cause contact dermatitis "in many cases" based on the aforementioned reasons, we conclude that there is a reasonable view of the evidence that supports the jury's verdict of guilty. Accordingly, the court abused its discretion by setting aside the verdict of the jury.
They lied again!!! They are trying to cover up the fact he failed to set it aside after the verdict was given!
The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded with direction to reinstate the jury's verdict and to proceed with sentencing.
All citations
124 Conn App 197 4 A 2d 347
It is all legal malpractice!
I have to resume this later. it is 3:05 pm and I had no sleep last night and was so anxious to get this all typed; if antying else, to clear mmy head for the doing the brief. She is a freaking fraud! The law specifically states the notice to quit defines the case. Nothing else can be brought up! In fact, her opinion in trial court deviates from this nefarious opinion. Both are nefarious!
I motioned for stay of Execution; it was denied! She nefariously ordered me me out from a Friday, in 5 straight days! Sneaking in the order after they see I checked the status of the case by spying on me!
==============================================================================
I am so tired of all this corruption!
I missed Scotty Kilmer 's Livestream Q&A today π€
==============================================================================
π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄π΄
My Comments from other social media
https://youtu.be/KWiay9HLuG8?si=r63hnl8IHNm8d2nB
A prominent attorney by the last name of Mawhinney wrote for WESTLAW and I was impressed with what I knew about him from what his widiw-wife shared with me. The llegal system has been hijacked by Nazi followers who have a big plan to hijack the country using satanic practices as their base to go by. It excuses their DECEPTION. Now more than ever, lawyers are often liars. I go through hell because I am against corruption. I am a peaceful, law-abiding person in a state where, ie, the Secretary of State told the attendees of the Women's Permanent Commission on the Status of Women OCSW - to use their children as owners of their *
business and they won't have to pay taxes! She went in to spread her corrupted cheat at UCinn Law School PLUS engage in pushing the Sandy Hook Shooting FRAUD for Barack Obama who stole over one trillion dollars from the economy - the Alex Jones trial was a sham to launder crime money because if you search for William Aldenburg Alex Jones trial - DAVID WHEELER impersonated him right at trial - he impersonated him at the Sandy Hook Shooting even - and Obama got FBI to refuse to arrest him and he continued to commit this federal offense - enough times to be out in prison for life just for that! Judges don't even necessarily have a law license even here! They are obviously wired and told what to do - rigged by the technocracy!
Attorney Mawhinney had been raked through the coals in Connecticut. I was devastated when I read up on that case! He obviously was subjected to this legal MALPRACTICE due to his upbringing. His grandfather was an upstanding man, former DA in a very corrupted place - Syracuse, NY. I knew his wife-widow , Anna - and was impressed with what she shared and how proud of her husband she was for standing up to crime. He passed away from a heart attack. Yet the Mafia had a stronghold there and if the politicians and govt leaders like mayors etc would have joined forces they could have eradicated this organized crime. She certainly was a woman if great ethics as well as prominence. Their family was very close as well. I am sure this grandson -attorney did nothing wrong. The elites wanted to get rid of him for standing up to crime by not participating, I'm sure.
==============================================================================
My typing is being switched around by some bastard hacking my blog! I will fix this before this is completed.
Not only is it illegal for the state to appeal when my appeal was being processed; but I was acquitted! Acquittals cannot be appealed!
In this matter, the defendant, Anne M. Bradley, was found guilty by a jury of breach of peace in the second degree in violation of General Statutes 53a-181 (6). The defendant thereafter moved for a judgment of acquittal, which the trial court granted on July 7, 2008. The state then filed a motion...
I also emphasized in court that when a person is charged breach of peace, they have to be in a public place. In this case, since they said Dr Kaplan was the victim, I would have had to have been at his office. I MAILED A PACKAGE. THE INVOLVES THE FED'S. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE PACKAGE. THEY HAD IT FOR THREE DAYS! THEY DID NOTHING but conspire and conjur up a way to entrap me! Breach of peace requires a person to be a public place! I argued that at trial court! I argued that the charging me at Voire Dire was criminal by the judge, whose sonny-boy was fired by me for not doing a damn thing for me when I was victim in the car accident - following the crimes of Attorney Fredrick Kendall when I was slammed into by a state sander truck on a sunny day and the roads were bare, as so described by Kendall himself when tormenting me why I did not get out of his way! He was a murderer tied to organized crime! My father wanted to help me and I said, "Dad, he will get you murdered!" My mother should have stepped in and revoke her hiring him and also tell the attorney off for entering my room when I was sick and out of it with a severe head injury telling me to sign papers! I had no sense of control over the issue! I was traumatized from all of it! People had to whisper - so now freaking YouTube puts ads on my account with people whispering to humor their sociopathic selves!
Update 9/1/2025. This phone is at 18% charge so I need to charge it before resuming my typing. I will return here in about an hour. - 7:36pm 9/1/2025
It's 9:17pm - I've been goofing off. I was typing JOSEPH ALEXANDER JAMES case, which is what judge bafoon used to let his conspiring prosecutor to appeal with. I'll come back to this yet feast your eyes on theππ© on that case if you have time.
Opinion:
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 20149) is denied.
Reason: Nonya business!
All Citations:
295 Conn 917, 990 A. 2d 867 (Mem)
.jpeg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.